Go fast and do not come back

Last monday, the French constitutionnal council confirmed that J. Bove could participate at the presidential elections. This participation definitively and officialy sign the end of the syndical life of this man who was never realy interessed by agriculture.
So, I know that the title I choose is a provocation, but it reveals what I think. This man just found a trade union to be justify his acts. He is a militant against liberalism since his studies. a political militant. That is the point that I would note. Jose Bove leaves his trade union to do political actions. But he want to keep an image of farmer. Here is my request : Jose Bove have to break the link between sydicalism and politics. Sydicalism must be politicaly neutral to be useful. and that's my last point, I do not want to take any position when I say that : he must choose between politics and syndicalism.

A little idea

I never think about that before seeing these photos.
When the line of the eyes is parallel of the line of the mouth, the people seems more serious.

The blog is chinese ( or japanese, Ihave not reconize the language ) but the photos are realy surprizing.

http://geoxia.blogspot.com/2007/03/blog-post_2004.html

Goodbye president

Some days ago, Jacques Chirac announced that he goes out of the French political scene. An occasion to review what he does during the forty years he spent on the French political scene. His opponents only retains from his two mandates past in the Elysée castle the crises which touch him. His fans see the positive points like opposition of the Iraki war. Nothing surprizing.
Personally I would only comment his last speech.
An image of neutral people comes to me from this intrevention. Such a ‘grand father’ of the nation, he simply gave clear orders, dead line to not cross. The message was as such intended to the French people as his successor. Some simple messages such as the necessity not to deal with extremismes, whatever where them, or a future problem that constitute the ecologic challenge.
Then, that could be a false image from myself, I would only say one thing, he leaves without main fault. So, I will say two last words for him : goodbye president.

maiksets

A rcneet sutdy sohws taht keiepng the frist and the lsat lteter in a wrod, and roidzniamng the ohrtes, eevry polepe can raed the snecetnes. So, now, I just clal you to stop to tkae crae of my otorpirhgahc maiksets.

5 years

There are already 5 years that the FARC (revolutionary armed forces of Colombia) holds Ingrid Bétancourt in their ‘jails’. 5 years of silence. 5 years out of freedom. In France, the status of political prisoner does not exist today, but in Colombia, a group of rebels have decided some years ago that this status could be normal. And so 3000 hostages are held for political or financial reasons in the Amazonian jungle by this group. That is a scandal, but there is something worse, the government Colombia do not try to liberate these hostage that are a great problem for the country. That is evident, make a blog message like I do today do not have any importance. So I call everibody that can all to join the collectives for Ingrid Betancourt's liberation. For democracy and freedom.

Completely irresponsible.

By listening to the speech of D. Voynet during the presidential conference for hunting, the only one reaction that comes to me is " she is completely irresponsible". It is not a comment on the fund that I do today, but just on the form. Indeed, this woman who is a candidate for the next presidential election is before all a political responsable. And this is the main reason that her intervention in front of hunters shocked me.
So, I have 2 problems. First, what is the interest for accepting an invitation coming from hunters if her only objective is to denounce them publicly and with cameras. At this level, I consider that it would be preferable to not go to this meeting rather than to provoke a public so susceptible and powerful that the hunters are.
Secondly, she is a candidate for a presidential election. Her role is, for me, to link the various sensibilities that France counts. That is why I do not really understand the reasons of this intervention.
In fact the main problem I have with this intervention is that she only do that to please an anti-hunt and extremist electorate, and that is for me dangerous for democraty.